Picture this.
K-dramas are taking over the world — Squid Game, Sweet Home, All of Us Are Dead.
Everywhere you look, one platform dominates: Netflix in Korea .
But here’s the twist — while Netflix helped Korean content go global, some experts say it might now be too dominant.
Recently, one Hollywood investor sounded the alarm:
“When there’s only one buyer, creators lose their power to negotiate.”
Whoa. That’s a bold statement.
So, what’s really going on behind the scenes?
Let’s rewind the story and understand how we got here — and what it means for the future of Korean entertainment.
The Beginning — From Hollywood to Seoul
In early November 2025, at a big event called U-KNOCK 2025 in Los Angeles, Vania Shlogel, the founder and CEO of Atwater Capital, took the stage.
She didn’t talk about the next big drama or celebrity gossip — she talked about power.
And more specifically, who holds it in Korea’s content market.
Atwater Capital is a Hollywood-based investment firm managing around $700 million.
They focus on media, entertainment, and sports, and work with giants like Goldman Sachs, EQT, KKR, and CAA.
Now, here’s the cool part — Vania revealed that she personally helped connect KOCCA (Korea Creative Content Agency) with CAA (Creative Artists Agency) — one of the biggest talent agencies in the world, representing Tom Cruise, Meryl Streep, and Steven Spielberg.
That’s a huge deal.
It basically means Korean creators are no longer knocking on Hollywood’s door — they’re inside the room.
But What’s the Problem Then?
You might think: “If Korean dramas are global hits, what’s the issue?”
Good question.
The issue isn’t about content quality — Korean storytelling is top-tier.
The problem lies in who’s buying that content.
In the U.S., there’s competition: Netflix, Disney+, HBO, Amazon Prime — all bidding for shows.
But in Korea? Netflix stands alone as the giant buyer.
So when only one company is buying, it sets the rules — it decides the price, the terms, even the creative direction sometimes.
As Vania said:
“In Korea, Netflix is overwhelmingly dominant. When there’s only one buyer, that platform dictates everything.”
That means even if a Korean producer has a great idea, they might be forced to sell it cheap or change it to fit Netflix’s preferences.
Korea’s Secret Weapon — Storytelling DNA
Vania also praised something unique about Korea — its storytelling.
She said, “Koreans have storytelling in their DNA.”
Because Korea’s written history is relatively short, oral storytelling traditions became strong.
That’s why Korean shows feel emotional, intense, and universal — people anywhere can connect.
Think about Parasite, Extraordinary Attorney Woo, or Squid Game — they all tell deeply human stories, even when the settings are wild or surreal.
That’s the magic of Korean content.
But when one platform dominates the market, creators start playing safe — and innovation slows down.
What Atwater Capital Is Doing in Korea
Now, Atwater Capital isn’t just talking — they’re investing.
They’ve backed companies like WIIP, a U.S. production house co-invested with Korea’s JTBC.
WIIP is behind hits like Mare of Easttown (HBO) and Dickinson (Apple TV+).
And Atwater’s role is to help such partnerships expand across borders — connecting Korean creativity with Hollywood’s infrastructure.
When asked what kind of Korean companies she invests in, Vania’s answer was simple:
“Global potential.”
If a company only targets the Korean market, it’s fine for local investors.
But if it has ideas or technology that can go international, Atwater steps in — and provides both funding and connections.

The Tech Angle — AI and the Future
Of course, we can’t ignore the buzzword: AI.
But here’s Vania’s interesting take:
“We don’t invest in companies that can be replaced by AI. We invest in companies that use AI to enhance what they do.”
She gave an example — Freepik, a Spanish design platform using AI for tools like text-to-image and text-to-video.
Freepik’s technology has already been used in Amazon Prime’s House of David.
And get this — over 100 million users use their tools every month!
That’s the kind of innovation investors love — AI that supports creativity, not kills it.
So… What Should Korean Creators Do Now?
According to Vania, the answer is clear:
“Build local partnerships.”
The U.S. market, she said, is huge and complicated.
Connections and relationships are everything.
Foreign companies often fail not because their content is bad, but because they don’t have the right network.
That’s why Atwater partnered with CAA — to open real Hollywood doors.
Vania believes Korean creators should do the same — collaborate with local players, agents, and producers who understand the U.S. system.
Because if you rely only on Netflix, your future is in someone else’s hands.
The Bigger Picture — A Warning and an Opportunity
So, what can we take away from all this?
Vania Shlogel’s message isn’t anti-Netflix — it’s pro-creator.
Netflix gave Korean content global exposure, yes.
But if the balance of power tilts too far one way, it hurts the creative ecosystem.
Her warning is a reality check:
“Korean content is world-class, but a one-buyer system can weaken the industry.”
It’s a call for Korean studios to think bigger — go beyond one platform, find global allies, and keep control of their own stories.
And it’s also a reminder to investors worldwide — the next wave of global storytelling might come not from Silicon Valley or Los Angeles, but from Seoul.
Because at the end of the day, no matter how much technology evolves,
the power of human stories will always win.


